Metastudie om forskjeller i avlingsnivå mellom økologisk og konvensjonell produksjon

| Type artikkel: Publisert studie
<span style="line-height: 1.5em;">Forskerne sammenligner økologiske og konvensjonelle avlinger med et nytt meta-datasett tre ganger større enn tidligere brukt (115 studier som inneholder mer enn 1000 observasjoner) og et nytt hierarkisk analytisk rammeverk som bedre kan redegjøre for heterogenitet og struktur i dataene.</span>

Forfattere:

Lauren C. Ponisio, Leithen K. M’Gonigle, Kevi C. Mace, Jenny Palomino, Perry de Valpine, Claire Kremen

Publiseringssted:

The Royal Society Publishing – Proceedings B

Årstall:

2014

Diversification practices reduce organic to conventional yield gap

 

Bakgrunn

Agriculture today places great strains on biodiversity, soils, water and the atmosphere, and these strains will be exacerbated if current trends in population growth, meat and energy consumption, and food waste continue. Thus, farming systems that are both highly productive and minimize environmental harms are critically needed. How organic agriculture may contribute to world food production has been subject to vigorous debate over the past decade.

 

Fremgangsmåte

Here, we revisit this topic comparing organic and conventional yields with a new meta-dataset three times larger than previously used (115 studies containing more than 1000 observations) and a new hierarchical analytical framework that can better account for the heterogeneity and structure in the data.

 

Funn

We find organic yields are only 19.2% (±3.7%) lower than conventional yields, a smaller yield gap than previous estimates. More importantly, we find entirely different effects of crop types and management practices on the yield gap compared with previous studies. For example, we found no significant differences in yields for leguminous versus non-leguminous crops, perennials versus annuals or developed versus developing countries. Instead, we found the novel result that two agricultural diversification practices, multi-cropping and crop rotations, substantially reduce the yield gap (to 9 ± 4% and 8 ± 5%, respectively) when the methods were applied in only organic systems.

 

Konklusjon

These promising results, based on robust analysis of a larger meta-dataset, suggest that appropriate investment in agroecological research to improve organic management systems could greatly reduce or eliminate the yield gap for some crops or regions.

Top